Soybean-Derived vs. Bovine-Derived Phosphatidylserine

Phosphatidylserine is another supplement that has received a lot of attention in the past few years. There are a number of helpful benefits associated with it including an improved memory, mood, and a number of other cognitive functions. However, there seems to be a debate right now over which type of source makes for the best supplement. The two choices are soybean or bovine (cow) derived Phosphatidylserine. In order to make an informed decision, it is helpful to first know the benefits of this supplement.

What Is Phosphatidylserine?

This supplement is actually a natural ingredient or component of the membranes of living cells. This substance is found in the cell membrane of neurons (brain cells). Phosphatidylserine comprises as much as 10 percent of the lipid content of these cells. While it is possible to obtain this ingredient from food, we do not actually get very much this way. Average daily consumption is around 100 to 150 mg.

Phosphatidylserine Benefits:

This supplement is thought to regulate how brain cells work and process information. This is done by these membranes actually controlling which nutrients are used by the brain and which are passed out as waste products.

Another excellent benefit of this supplement is that it helps to improve communication between the various brain cells and hemispheres. This communication is thought to occur by increasing the number of receptors and increasing the production of Acetylcholine, a powerful neurotransmitter that plays a key role in memory formation, learning, and other cognitive functions.

While taking this supplement, memory is enhanced and so is the general speed of recall. Many users also report having much improved clarity and speed of thought. Attention span is increased and so are the abilities to concentrate and focus.

Phosphatidylserine Supplements: Bovine Or Soybean Derived?

In the past, most Phosphatidylserine was produced from bovine or cow sources. The raw ingredients were actually extracted from the brains of cows. Currently, most of the product on the market is soybean derived due to the FDA concerns about things like mad cow disease and other health issues. Almost all of the studies indicate the excellent benefits of this supplement were performed a few years ago using bovine derived sources.

There are some differences between the two sources. Bovine derived is usually attached to long chained polyunsaturated fatty acids (DHA or AA). The soybean derived variety is usually attached to saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids. While it does follow that many of the benefits should be similar, new studies need to be performed.

Is the Media Ruining our Memory?

It seems that in the digital age stimuli from every direction barrage our brains. There is advertising, television, radio, and of course the internet. The media has become so ubiquitous that now ‘multitasking’ is a common word. However, the question must be asked as to whether or not all of these stimuli are actually ruining our memory. Maybe all of this input is causing sensory overload, which leads to people not being able to remember or to even focus as well as we once did.

Multiple Media Users Actually Poor Multitaskers:

The University of Wyoming recently conducted a study in relation to the use of multiple media. A number of people were observed and then classified as heavy or light media multitaskers. When they were then tested on things like working memory, fluid intelligence, working memory, and task switching it became apparent that the heavy media users were actually more impulsive and had lower levels of fluid intelligence.

This result means that the more media someone is exposed to, the less actual concentration they are able to give to any particular task. Media, especially the internet, is also leading us to be more likely to remember where we can find information, rather than actually focusing on the information itself and storing it within our minds. Perhaps this is because we are all so busy today that it is much more difficult to actually pay attention to something in particular when everything is going on around us.

How Memory Has Changed in the Digital Age:

According to scientists, memory has always been transaction oriented in nature. This means that we focus much more on where to find things, rather than trying to internalize and remember every little detail. At least we do this with things that are not critical. On the other hand, if there is information we need to know, we make special effort to ensure this is committed to actual working memory.

Technology and the media have certainly changed things. For most of human history, the most reliable sources of information were other people. If there was something that we needed to know, it was a simple matter of finding someone who did and then we could remember this new information ourselves. Now, the media and the internet have replaced this person-to-person information network in favor of a digital network. The bottom line is still that we remember what we want and file the rest under the heading of ‘go here to learn more.’